[Analysis of preoperative risk factors of adjacent segment disease after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion]. / Analiz predoperatsionnykh faktorov riska degenerativnogo zabolevaniya smezhnogo segmenta posle vypolneniya transforaminal'nogo poyasnichnogo spondilodeza.

Currently, there is no information on the combined effect of body mass index (BMI), age, gender, main spinal-pelvic parameters and parameters of adjacent functional spinal unit (FSU) degeneration according to magnetic resonance imaging on development of adjacent segment degenerative disease (ASDd). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of preoperative biometric and instrumental parameters of adjacent FSU on the risk of ASDd after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and determine personalized neurosurgical approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied patients after single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (group I, n=54), single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and interspinous stabilization of adjacent level (group II, n=55), preventive rigid fusion of adjacent segment (group III, n=56). Preoperative parameters and long-term clinical outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Paired correlation analysis established the main predictors of ASDd. Regression analysis determined absolute values of these predictors for each type of surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: Surgical intervention at the level of asymptomatic proximal adjacent segment is recommended as interspinous stabilization for moderate degenerative lesions, BMI <25 kg/m2, difference between pelvic index and lumbar lordosis 10.5-15°, segmental lordosis 6.5-10.5°. In case of severe degenerative lesions, BMI 25.1-31.1 kg/m2, significant deviations of spinal-pelvic parameters (segmental lordosis 5.5-10.5°, difference between pelvic index and lumbar lordosis 15.2-20°), preventive rigid stabilization is indicated.

[Long-term results and predictors of postoperative outcomes in patients with cauda equina syndrome following degenerative lumbar spine disease]. / Otdalennye rezul'taty i faktory, vliyayushchie na iskhod khirurgicheskogo lecheniya sindroma konskogo khvosta, obuslovlennogo degenerativnym zabolevaniem poyasnichnogo otdela pozvonochnika.

Cauda equina syndrome (CES) associated with acute disc extrusion or spinal stenosis often requires emergency surgery. Analysis of the Pubmed, Medline and eLibrary databases revealed a few studies devoted to long-term postoperative outcomes in patients with CES caused by degenerative spine disease. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term postoperative results and predictors of clinical and neurological outcomes in patients with CES caused by degenerative lumbar spine disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS. D: Ecompressive and decompressive-stabilizing procedures were performed in 211 patients with CES caused by degenerative lumbar spine disease between 2000 and 2020. Long-term clinical parameters were available in 174 patients with mean follow-up period of 7 years. Sixty-eight patients had unsatisfactory postoperative outcomes. We assessed postoperative clinical and neurological outcomes in patients with CES and predictors of these outcomes. RESULTS: We identified the following predictors of clinical and neurological outcomes using binary logistic regression model: period between clinical manifestation and surgery >48 hours, preoperative neurological impairment, spinal canal diameter, surgical procedure, dimension of herniated disc, ASA score and long-term postoperative analgesia with narcotic analgesics. CONCLUSION: Preoperative planning and possible correction of the above-mentioned risk factors will potentially improve postoperative outcomes in patients with CES caused by degenerative lumbar spine disease.

[Analysis of unfavorable postoperative outcomes in patients with lumbosacral junction anomalies]. / Analiz neudovletvoritel'nykh rezul'tatov khirurgicheskogo lecheniya patsientov s anomaliyami poyasnichno-kresttsovogo perekhoda pozvonochnika.

BACKGROUND: The absence of a unified diagnostic approach and heterogeneous treatment strategies in patients with lumbosacral transitional vertebra contribute to registration of contradictory data on postoperative outcomes in these patients. OBJECTIVE: A retrospective analysis of postoperative outcomes in patients with degenerative lumbar spine diseases associated with lumbosacral junction anomalies and causes of unfavorable results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Lumbosacral transitional vertebra was preoperatively verified and classified according to Castellvi A.E. in 352 cases between 2007 and 2017. Full-time examination, phone and e-mail survey covered 314 (89.2%) patients throughout 5.2-year follow-up period. There were unfavorable clinical outcomes in 42 cases. We analyzed the causes of these results and relationship of surgical strategy with the type of lumbosacral junction anomaly. RESULTS: Lumbosacral transitional vertebra Castellvi type IIA (30.9%) and IIIA (34.9%) prevailed. Unfavorable outcomes occurred in 7 cases after percutaneous interventions, in 12 patients after decompression surgery and in 23 patients after decompression and stabilization procedures. In all cases (n=42), redo surgery was performed: rigid fixation or extension of stabilization system in 16 cases, additional intracanal decompression in 10 patients, foraminal/extraforaminal decompression in 8 patients. Seven patients underwent repeated laser denervation. Of these, 5 patients underwent dorsal decompression without discectomy due to ineffective denervation. Correlation analysis showed the relationship between unfavorable outcomes after percutaneous procedures with LV transverse process dysplasia and sacralization, decompressive interventions with additional articular joints and lumbarization, decompression/stabilization procedures with LV transverse process dysplasia and sacralization. CONCLUSION: Unfavorable outcomes occurred after percutaneous interventions for anomaly type IB and IIIB, decompressive procedures for anomaly type IIA, IIB and IV, decompression/ stabilization procedures for types IA and IIIA. It is the first report devoted to analysis of relationships between unsatisfactory postoperative outcomes, surgical technique and type of lumbosacral dysgenesis.

[Results of the study of functional recovery of professional athletes after minimally invasive lumbar fusion]. / Rezul'taty provedeniya minimal'no-invazivnogo poyasnichnogo spondilodeza u professional'nykh sportsmenov.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a comprehensive clinical-neurological assessment and to study the results of functional recovery of professional athletes after minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The retrospective study included 27 patients-professional athletes who were operated on using minimally invasive decompression and stabilization techniques in the period 2010 to 2019. Clinical-neurological effectiveness was assessed when returning to previous sports activity was 14 (9; 17) weeks and 4 (3; 5) years after surgery. RESULTS: The follow-up showed a significant improvement in clinical and neurological parameters: persistent elimination of radicular and muscular-skeletal symptoms, a decrease in the level of pain according to a visual analogue scale in the lumbar spine from 68 (61; 85) mm to 3 (2; 11) mm (p=0.002) and in the lower extremities from 84 (78; 91) mm to 1 (0; 3) mm (p=0.001), change in the physical component of health from 26.18 (23.58; 28.37) to 49.82 (49.03; 53.04) (p=0.002) and the psychological component of health from 27.87 (26.22; 29.29) to 52.18 (49.12; 55.66) (p=0.001), significant improvement in the perception of physical activity according to the Borg RPE Scale from 17 (16; 18) points to 9 (8; 9) (p<0.001). In one case (3.7%), the patient did not return to his previous sports career. CONCLUSION: The use of minimally invasive rigid stabilization in the overwhelming majority of professional athletes made it possible in the shortest possible time to achieve regression of neurological symptoms, reduce pain, improve the quality of life, restore the functional state and return to previous sports activities.

Accelerated Recovery Program for Patients with Polysegmental Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the accelerated recovery program for patients with polysegmental degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine. Materials and Methods: This prospective study included 53 patients who underwent two-level transforaminal interbody fusion in the LII-SI segments. Two groups were identified: in group 1 (n=24), operations were performed using the accelerated recovery program; in group 2 (n=29), open rigid stabilization was used under traditional intravenous anesthesia. The end-point parameters were the number of bed-days spent in the hospital after the operation, the number of perioperative surgical complications and adverse effects of anesthesia, and the number of re-hospitalizations within 90 days. We also recorded the time of patient activation, the level of pain around the operated zone (using a visual analogue scale), and the quality of life in the long-term postoperative period (median 18 months); the latter was assessed using the SF-36 questionnaire (physical and psychological components of health). Results: Patients under the accelerated recovery program were found to have a shorter duration of surgery and anesthesia, less blood loss, lower amounts of injected opioids, faster verticalization, and a reduced period of inpatient treatment (p<0.05 for all parameters). As compared to group 2, patients in group 1 had a lower level of pain in the surgery zone (p<0.05), better long-term indicators of the physical and psychological components of health (p<0.05), a lower number of anesthesia-associated adverse events (p<0.05), and a lower rate of postoperative complications (p<0.05). During the 90-day postoperative observation, four patients of group 2 (13.8%) were urgently referred to a medical institution for additional medical care. Conclusion: The accelerated recovery program for two-level interbody fusion showed its safety and high clinical efficiency in the treatment of patients with polysegmental degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine. The program can be used in any center for spine surgery where effective interaction between polyvalent medical and nursing teams is maintained.

[Results of minimally invasive lumbar fusion in professional athletes: a single-center retrospective study]. / Rezul'taty minimal'no invazivnogo poyasnichnogo spondilodeza u professional'nykh sportsmenov: odnotsentrovoe retrospektivnoe issledovanie.

Professional athletes have a high basic level of physical fitness and significant motivation for returning to previous rhythm of functional activity within the shortest period after trauma without deterioration of baseline level of sportsmanship. Despite the well-presented results of lumbar spine fusion in general population, these data among professional athletes are not well understood. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the results of minimally invasive lumbar fusion in professional athletes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study included 27 athletes (19 men and 8 women) aged 29 (26; 34) years after minimally invasive lumbar spine decompression and fusion via anterior, lateral and posterior approaches. Total lumbar lordosis, degenerative changes in adjacent segment, area of multifidus muscle, perioperative complications and timing of sports rehabilitation were analyzed within 3-5 (mean 4) years after surgery. RESULTS: We found an increase of total lumbar lordosis from 35.2° to 44.1° (p=0.02), no significant muscle atrophy (<30%) and degeneration of adjacent segment (p>0.05). There were 5 perioperative complications (18.5%). Mean period of sports rehabilitation was 14 (9; 17) weeks. One (3.7%) patient did not return to his previous sports career. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive short-segment lumbar interbody fusion in professional athletes is characterized by low risk of fixation element failure, no significant degeneration of adjacent level and postoperative muscle atrophy. This procedure ensures early rehabilitation and returning to sports.

[Effectiveness of simultaneous and staged minimally invasive dorsal decompression-stabilization procedures in patients with lumbar spine degenerative diseases]. / Sravnenie effektivnosti ispol'zovaniya simul'tannykh i etapnykh minimal'no-invazivnykh dorsal'nykh dekompressivno-stabiliziruyushchikh vmeshatel'stv u patsientov s degenerativnymi zabolevaniyami poyasnichnogo otdela pozvonochnika.

Minimally invasive procedures reduce the trauma of spine surgery. However, they are associated with high complexity of manipulations, long learning curve, need for expensive equipment for intraoperative navigation and significant irradiation. Various options for surgical approaches are being developed to reduce irradiation of medical staff and patients, surgery time and the number of drugs administered for general anesthesia. Simultaneous surgical interventions (SiSI) is one of these options. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of simultaneous and staged minimally invasive dorsal decompression-stabilization procedures in patients with lumbar spine degenerative diseases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective study included 67 patients (41 men and 26 women) aged 48 (34; 56) years who underwent a single-level minimally invasive spinal root decompression and transforaminal interbody fusion via Wiltse posterior-lateral approach. Two study groups were distinguished: group I (simultaneous surgical interventions, SiSI) (n=29), in which guide spokes and transpedicular screws were installed simultaneously by two surgeons within one x-ray session from two sides; group II (staged surgical interventions, StSI) (n=38), in which staged transpedicular stabilization was performed (decompression side followed by contralateral side). Mean follow-up was 14 months in group I and 20 months in group II. We considered intraoperative fluoroscopy and irradiation dose, duration of surgery and anesthesia with calculation of doses of opioid drugs, blood loss, time of activation, hospital-stay and perioperative morbidity. Clinical outcomes were studied in long-term postoperative period. RESULTS: Simultaneous approach ensured less time of intraoperative fluoroscopy (p=0.029) and irradiation dose (p=0.035), duration of surgery (p=0.01) and anesthesia (p=0.02), amount of opioid drugs during anesthesia (p=0.017). Blood loss, duration of activation and hospitals-stay were similar in both groups (p=0.35, p=0.12 and p=0.57, respectively). There was comparable improvement in VAS score of pain in the lumbar spine and lower extremities in both groups (p=0.63 and p=0.31, respectively). According to SF-36 questionnaire, there was no between-group difference in physical and psychological components (p=0.44 and p=0.72, respectively). There was significantly greater number of adverse effects of anesthesia in the StSI group (26.2% vs. 6.8%, p=0.003). At the same time, the number of surgical postoperative complications was similar in both groups (3.4% vs. 5.3%, p=0.62). CONCLUSION: Simultaneous minimally invasive dorsal decompression-stabilization procedures have some significant advantages over staged approach regarding intraoperative parameters and adverse effects of anesthesia in patients with lumbar spine degenerative diseases. Nevertheless, there were similar clinical data and small incidence of surgical perioperative complications.

[The effectiveness of local application of vancomycin powder in the prevention of surgical site infections in spine surgery: a meta-analysis]. / Effektivnost' lokal'nogo primeneniya poroshka vankomitsina v profilaktike infektsii oblasti khirurgicheskogo vmeshatel'stva v spinal'noi khirurgii: metaanaliz.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a meta-analysis of studies examining the effectiveness of the local application of vancomycin powder for the prophylaxis of surgical site infections (SSIs) in spine surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort studies and prospective randomized clinical trials were searched for in the Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and eLibrary databases published from 2008 to December 2018. For the resulting variables, the odds ratio and 95% confidence interval were calculated using random and fixed effects models. Estimation of the degree of heterogeneity is estimated using the coefficient I2. Statistically significant differences were considered differences p<0.05. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 28 clinical studies that included the results of the local application of vancomycin powder in 17,469 patients after performing various spinal surgical interventions. Two publications had a prospective, randomized, controlled study design. Topical application of vancomycin powder reduces the incidence of SSIs after spine surgery (p<0.0001). The use of vancomycin powder reduces the incidence of SSIs in patients operated on with stabilizing implants (p=0.004). On the other hand, the topical application of vancomycin powder did not affect the prevalence of SSIs in respondents who were operated on without the use of stabilizing implants (p=0.12) or due to deformities of the spine (p=0.06). CONCLUSION: Topical application of vancomycin powder is highly effective in preventing the development of SSIs in patients after spinal surgical interventions.

[Analysis of the results of total cervical disc arthroplasty using a M6-C prosthesis: a multicenter study]. / Analiz rezul'tatov primeneniia total'noi artroplastiki mezhpozvonkovogo diska sheinogo otdela pozvonochnika protezom M6-S: mul'titsentrovoe issledovanie.

Cervical spondylosis and intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration are the most common cause for compression of the spinal cord and/or its roots. Total IVD arthroplasty, as a modern alternative to surgical treatment of IVD degeneration, is gaining popularity in many neurosurgical clinics around the world. Aim - the study aim was to conduct a multicenter analysis of cervical spine arthroplasty with an IVD prosthesis M6-C ('Spinal Kinetics', USA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 112 patients (77 males and 35 females). All patients underwent single-level discectomy with implantation of the artificial IVD prosthesis M6-C. The follow-up period was up to 36 months. Dynamic assessment of the prosthesis was based on clinical parameters (pain intensity in the cervical spine and upper extremities (visual analog scale - VAS); quality of life (Neck Disability Index - NDI)); and subjective satisfaction with the results of surgical treatment (Macnab scale) and instrumental data (range of motion in the operated spinal motion segment, degree of heterotopic ossification (McAfee-Suchomel classification), and time course of degenerative changes in the adjacent segments).